Qualitative Research and the Editorial Tradition: A Mixed Metaphor

AMTRACT ' !&a F.I>ITORIAI, PROCFSS FOR JOURNALS in library arid information science has tended to follow quantitative positivist research standards. Qualitative research presents problems of definition, structure, voice, and meaning that can influence the reactions of editors arid referees, who may reject that which they do not adequately understand. Publication of reports of qualitative research projects may require some accommodation by authors, editors, editorial hoards, and ad hoc referees. This article discusses why authors should understand the editorial process-what is expected and what is required--and the ways in which it influences the characteristics of individual .journals. Editors, editorial boards, and referees should try to better understand what authors expect of them. Strategies for changing this in the editorial environment can be implemented through attention to the partnership that links authors and editors in their shared goal of benefitting both individual readers and the profession as a whole.